To sum up: a dry cleaners lost a pair of pants. The man then tried to sue for $67 million dollars because there is a sign "guaranteed satisfaction." He is claiming he's asking so much because he represents the millions of abused customers. He also forgot to mention that he claimed bankruptcy a year ago and can't find a job.
********
WASHINGTON (AP) - A judge ruled Monday in favour of a dry cleaner who was sued for US$54 million over a missing pair of pants.
The judge's decision said Custom Cleaners did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act by failing to live up to Roy Pearson's expectations of the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign once displayed in the store's window. Judge Judith Bartnoff of District of Columbia Superior Court ordered Pearson to pay the court costs of defendants Soo Chung, Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung.
Pearson, an administrative law judge, originally sought $67 million from the Chungs, claiming they lost a pair of suit trousers and later tried to give him a pair that he said was not his.
He arrived at the amount by adding up years of alleged law violations and almost $2 million in common law claims.
He arrived at the amount by adding up years of alleged law violations and almost $2 million in common law claims.
Pearson later dropped demands for damages related to the pants and focused his claims on signs in the shop, which have since been removed.
Chris Manning, the Chungs' lawyer, argued that no reasonable person would interpret the signs to mean an unconditional promise of satisfaction.
The Chungs said the trial had taken an enormous financial and emotional toll on them and exposed them to widespread ridicule.
The two-day trial earlier this month drew a standing-room-only crowd and overshadowed the drunken driving trial of former mayor Marion Barry.
*****************
First, I would order a donkey to kick Pearson in the nuts for being retarded, greedy, abusing the court system and an opportunistic slug.
Then, I would order the dry cleaners to go to Wal-Mart and buy Pearson a new pair of pants, costing roughly $50--and that's probably a great pair of pants from Wal Mart! Along with the new pants, I would have them apologize for losing his pants.
Then, as the real judge did, I would have Pearson pay for all the dry cleaner's legal fees and legally change his name to Jack Ass after berating Pearson for being a leech on society and claiming this frivolous lawsuit would make him a hero to all American consumers.
He lost his pants. He should get his pants back with an apology. Be thankful for what he's got. Shut the hell up. Go home and find another dry cleaner.






